<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>ChangeForge - Latest Comments in ChangeForge | Ken Stewart | Where business and technology collide &amp;raquo; The 10%</title><link>http://changeforge.disqus.com/</link><description>Applying technology smartly, engaging change considerately and motivating people genuinely.</description><atom:link href="https://changeforge.disqus.com/changeforge_ken_stewart_where_business_and_technology_collide_raquo_the_10/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 22:09:54 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: ChangeForge | Ken Stewart | Where business and technology collide &amp;raquo; The 10%</title><link>http://www.changeforge.com/2008/05/07/the-10/#comment-1486455</link><description>&lt;p&gt;An avid GTD fan I see! I love it. I need to take a clue from this, but the scientific side of me has trouble slicing my life so neatly; perhaps that is the missing link!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I love what you say about e-mail being a communication tool, not a database! My only contention would be that it works so wonderfully for CYA situations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But to this point, I actually am in the process of working on a document retention policy and guess what? I actually came to this very same conclusion myself. "We don't archive e-mails. If an individual does, so be it, but this is not a supported corporate policy, nor do we endorse this activity."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't know where that would put us, but working in a privately held company does have some advantages with regards to compliance.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChangeForge | Ken Stewart</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 22:09:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>